View Single Post
  #5  
Old May 9th 05, 05:52 PM
Andrew Robert Breen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Keith W wrote:

"Eunometic" wrote in message
Only if you assume the proximity fuse is a 100% effective super weapon

Presumably Wellingtons could be fitted with two stage supercharged
merlins and a presurised fueselage.


Presumably NOT, a pressurised fuselage is a non trivial modn.


Actually, the flying breadbasket /was/ built in a high-altitude, pressurised
version (in fact much of the UK development of pressurisation was done
using the Wellington). Obviously the fuselage itself wasn't pressurised
(fabric not being much good for that) but a pressurised crew area
was developed and flown. The two types were the Mk.V and VI, both
fitted with pressurised cockpit and high-altitude versions of the Bristol
Hercules.

http://www.fortunecity.com/tattooine...120/welly.html

Vickers were leaders (in .uk) in working on stratospheric
aircraft - the Barnes Wallis proposals for the Victory
Bomber was one strand, the original design for the Windsor
another (hence the guns in remote-control barbettes in
the tails of the engine nacelles) and the 75- and 100-
ton giants of the 1944 programme a third. None ever
reached squadron service, but all (except the Victory)
were far more than just paper aeroplanes.

--
Andy Breen ~ Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group
http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/
"Who dies with the most toys wins" (Gary Barnes)