In article XjnCb.319371$Dw6.1091097@attbi_s02,
Juan..E.-Jimenez b*d&5^-@-*b(d)5+.!c#o$m wrote:
Where's the proof?

Where's *your* proof that _any_ of the following are true:
A) He wasn't at SnF at all
B) He was there, but he didn't have a truck there
C) He was there with a truck, but the truck wasn't his.


Can you even identify _which_ of the above scenarios is what you actually
claim to be "true"?

Or are you still an admitted liar and fraud?


Remember, it's all about the credibility you don't have...

Remember, it's all about the credibility *YOU* don't have...