View Single Post
  #60  
Old April 27th 07, 11:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Daryl Hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION


"Yeff" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:07:54 -0700, Daryl Hunt wrote:

"Tankfixer" wrote in message
news


snip

While you are at it tell us again about the FB-4 nuclear bombers of the
1960's.


LOL, you have already been blown out of the water on that one. Guess

you
are just recycling your old lies. Ask Ed if he ever was on a Nuke

loaded
Phantom.


Yes, let's ask Ed. From Google http://preview.tinyurl.com/2h5fw5 when

Ed
wrote the following:

The 401st TFW out of Torrejon conducted most of the rotational support
for the Victor mission out of Incirlik, although over the years of the
cold war there were a lot of tactical aircraft that sat alert with
nukes. Torrejon F-4s were originally E-models, but the wing converted
to C's in '73 in a rearrangement of all the USAFE F-4s to standardize
E's in Germany, D's in England and the C wing in Spain. I sat Victor
in an F-4C, but never heard it referred to as an FB or BF.

He's already stated he has.


Yes, he's stated that he sat alert in an F-4C and never heard of it
referred to as an FB-4.

But, again, don't let facts get in the way of you recycling your lies.


He's recycling the very things you yourself have said.


Yes he is. And he's trying to hide the fact he's just a low level troll.
Besides, I guess the Fighter/Bomber designation from MD says they haven't a
clue to the own AC usage is supposed to be.

I can see that you are coming to their aid since they are cornered once
again. I thought you had given up on that. Well, you just got demoted back
to the dismal 404thk00ks. Nice job. You are now wide open for any and all
criticism that comes their way. Guess you will never learn.