Jay Honeck wrote:

It's a plausible explanation, except for one thing: We're dealing with
people who strap explosives to mentally handicapped people and blow up
school buses. These aren't the sharpest sticks in the bunch, and I
think you're giving them more credit for strategic thinking than they
deserve.

Well....don't forget that the strategic thinking doesn't happen at the
suicide bomber level. That's a bit above their pay grade I would imagine.
The bombers are simply the "tools" of the movement. The "thinking" comes
much higher up, and these people are the chess players.

I have always believed that 9-11 was devised by the chess players to
create the exact result it has achieved. I've never for a moment
believed that those buildings were brought down to destroy the buildings
or kill the people. That to me was simply the "tool" designed to open
the door that the "thinkers" believed would split the United States wide
open politically which it and the events post 9-11 certainly has done.

Now that the country has been split like it has, the scenario for the
"thinkers" has changed. Another attack would undue what they have
achieved and re-unite the country against them.
In other words, using the immortal phrases of one Kenny Rogers,
"You got to know when to hold up!!"

To me, the terrorist strategy is glaringly apparent. You first split the
country, then you let it destroy itself from within. You sit back and
watch. It's the old divide and conquer all over again, only this time it
smells of camel crap :-)


--
Dudley Henriques