On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:28:24 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:30:10 +0200, G Paleologopoulos wrote:

"Ari Silverstein" wrote
...

On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:54:29 -0800 (PST), Mark. wrote:

Valid points within reason. By virtue of the fact that it
*is* military, right off the bat we know that cost has a far
different priority. The military can not only spend more due
to the fact that they won't go out of business, but they WILL
spend more due to nepotism. Cost overruns are business
as usual.

Bull**** and proof that you have never been involved in a Prime
Contractor relationship with the miliary.

Stupid git.

That you are.

That's telling him, Ari!
You really know the ins-and-outs of the military procurement processes!

Got that right.

Care to match wits? Eh?

No?

What a surprise, a drive-by moron.
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!