"Denyav" wrote in message
...
Nice way of dodging some questions.


Nope its an accurate answer

Very obviously.

public hearing before the
committee. All witnesses who retained counsel-Admiral Stark, Admiral
Kimmel, and General Short-were given the opportunity to be examined by
their counsel if they so desired, and to submit questions to committee
counsel to be asked other.

Monkey investigation designed by the designers of Pearl Harbor conspiracy
to
white wash their actions .Members of congress were only allowed to see
what
they allowed to see at that time.

Quite the contary, the members of congress drove the inquiry
and were not part of the 1941 administration

See the minority report of the same.

Which is inevitable when irrelevant issues are raised.
Yeah Right,you made it clear before,every evidence if it points to a
direction
other than offical direction is irrelevant.


And yet Stinnet claims that they are in the bnational archive
http://www.independent.org/tii/news/021202Stinnett.html


Yet the very same Stinnett claims that all Crane documents about
intercepted
pre-Pearl Harbor JN25B dispatches have been removed from Archive II
because of
NSA withdrawal notices and none of then are available to public scholars
or
even Congressmen.

Actually he says they were transferred from the NSA to the
National Archive and that he got them from there

And thats the truth you can check it for yourself.

I have

NSA have issued almost three dozen withdrawal notices for Crane documents
up to
this date,almost all of them affecting solely pre Pearl Harbor documents.



Those withdrawals are alleged to have happpened in 1999, the congressional
inquiry you mentioned happened 6 years PRIOR to that date

They stated not

I am sure Sen.Thurman and Rep.Spence would strongly disagree with your
statement.

Hardly
Yeah right,then you must ask Marshall why he offered his resignation upon
this
report?


He was cheif of staff, any honorable man would do the samed

No bananas here bwana, note the last thing Britain wanted in
1941 was war with Japan, it diverted massive resources
away from the war in Europe at a time when the Nazis
were only 150 miles away from

Actually nobody really wanted a war with Japan,but Japan
was,unfortunately the
key to thrust America,a country with a big German-American population but
ruled
by an Anglo-American minority,into the war aganist Germany .


Incorrect, there was no treaty requirement for Germany to go to
war, Japan did NOT declare war on the USSR

"As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society,it may find it
more
difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues ,except in the
circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external
threat"
Zbigniew Brzezinski
Grand Chessboard 1997.


More irrelevance

The architect of Afghan trap was right on 1941,he was also proven right in
2001.
There arent too many southern baptists in London old son.

But the threat the London face now is much bigger than the threat
represented
by the corporal or by the French Fleet,England survived under Roman rule
and
would very probably would have survived under French or German rule,to say
at
least.

Aint no threat from bananas bwana

Israelis have waited 2000 years to return to their homeland,they could
easily
wait for another 200 years to create the Greater Israel,but its very
doubtful
if England and London could afford to wait for 20 years.


So you think the Israelis are about to invade Britain !

ROTFLMAO

Keith