Actually he says they were transferred from the NSA to the
National Archive and that he got them from there

Actually the "Days of Deceipt" was based on the first batch of the Crane
documents transfered to College Park.
After the "Days of Deceipt" appeared late 1999,NSA suddenly started issuing
withdrawal notices.
Today all pre-Pearl Harbor dispatches,including ones that Stinnett was able to
see before publishing his book was removed from the Crane files.

And thats the truth you can check it for yourself.

I have

No,you did not,go to College Park and try to see the documents Stinnett
mentioned.
You won't see any now.

Those withdrawals are alleged to have happpened in 1999, the congressional
inquiry you mentioned happened 6 years PRIOR to that date

Transfer of Crane Documents started in 93/94,before 99 only first batch of
documents were released and they were the ones researched by Stinnett.
Congressmens asked for access to Naval storage Vault in Crane IN. in 1995.
Their requests were denied.

He was cheif of staff, any honorable man would do the samed

This honorable man, famous for his photographic memory ,was never be able to
remember his whereabouts on the eve of Pearl Harbor attack.

Memory gaps and word "irrelevant" are very common things in Pearl Harbor story.

Incorrect, there was no treaty requirement for Germany to go to
war, Japan did NOT declare war on the USSR

Both FDR and Churchill knew from Magic intercepts that Hitler had to declare
war on US in case of an US-Japan war.

"As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society,it may find it
more
difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues ,except in the
circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external

threat"
Zbigniew Brzezinski
Grand Chessboard 1997.


More irrelevance

Actually its absolutely most important part of whole story,it explains why
Pearl Harbor and 9/11 happened and why new Pearl Harbors and 9/11s will happen
even more frequently.
Only one question remains:What are the foreign policy issues?
Are we talking about US foreign policy issues or foreign policy issues of
Anglos,residing in US and UK and in Downunder?

would very probably would have survived under French or German rule,to say
at
least.

Aint no threat from bananas bwana

Tell that to Sir David,David King to be sure.

So you think the Israelis are about to invade Britain !

No,I think 9/11 ,like its predecessor Pearl Harbor,was again a joint production
of Anglos on both sides of Atlantic.