View Single Post
  #4  
Old August 9th 04, 02:49 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Eunometic" wrote in message
m...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message

...
"Eunometic" wrote in message
om...
Cub Driver wrote in message

. ..
Pete Stickney wrote in another thread:



These allied engines were so succesfull and powerfull that non of them
could be installed on an aircraft. irony off


What propelled the Meteor then ?

Rubber bands ?


The Welland of the Meteor I could, admitedly, outperform a rubber band

The Meteor III improved the situation but was still no faster than a
top line piston fighter at altitude. (TA 152H, P51H, Spitefull, Do
335, P47M)


Meteor III was considered superior to the Tempest V in all depts
except for roll rate, the Meteor III's with long nacelles were faster
than the Me-262 and the Meteor IV's were capable of 580 mph

Keith




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---