In article ,
on 08 Jun 2004 21:58:19 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

As a result Kimmel and Short were sent a message that
began "This is to be considered a war warning"

They also added that Pearl Harbor was only possible target.period.

Bullcrap

It did no such thing and to state otherwise is dishonest.

You have proven you havn't read the war warning that was sent on 28 Nov 1941


So which is it ?
Did he try to contact people or do nothing

Do you think that Navy and Army units in Pasific were alerted and waiting for
Japanase to attack?

They had been givin warning on 28 Nov.


Hardly a blueprint of the Pearl Harbor attack plan.

You could only say that if officers of US military intelligence had NOT told to
their superiors cleary "Target is Pearl Harbor" but they did say exactly that
since Nov,28.

When and where did they do so ?

So since Nov,28 they knew the target thanks to work of a few men.
Since their superiors did not respond to their warnings one of
them,Thurman,sidestepped the line of command and personaly went all way up to
White House,with very clear warning of japanase attack with the name of the
target "Pearl Harbor".

Reprinting a lie does not make it so. The 14 part message had no referance
to any target.



For you I'm sure thats true.


Put the blame on Guetenberg and also countless creators of the "
Information Age".

Perhaps you should try reading some and come back ?


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.