View Single Post
  #13  
Old December 6th 03, 05:17 PM
RobertR237
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "red12049"
writes:


Well,

for what its' worth.... I sent a copy of this (less any names) to Jim at ANN
and his response was that Pulsar didn't reply, they hung up, and that the
rest was a lie, and his lawyers could prove it. Not sure he realizes (at
least until he sees this, that I also posted the e-mail in the community
forum. Might as well use his own resources to dispute him, since he is so
kind as to provide them....

Red



Gee, I don't know how well Jim and ANN are doing but he must be making a bunch
of lawyers very happy with all the proving they must be doing.

What really ****es me off about this is the use of a very sad and unfortunate
accident as a ploy to further his own agenda and slander a company who really
had nothing to do with the accident and no direct knowledge regarding the
accident. Any call to Pulsar by the normal news media would have been to
gather information on the aircraft that is already well known (or should be) to
ANN. Any call to Pulsar by ANN would have been placed with the full advance
knowledge that under the circumstances Pulsar would have nothing to say to ANN
and nothing to add to the report. The entire story and call was a frame job
from the outset with the intent to try and imply blame on Pulsar. The same
damn dirty crap they have been doing to Chuck all these years.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)