View Single Post
  #80  
Old August 17th 04, 09:21 PM
Thelasian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Keith Willshaw"



Denyev has pulled this gag before. If you ask him to prove it he can't so

he
just repeats the same lies.

Want a real laugh ask him about the two atomic bombs the Nazis tested and

how
the U.S. couldn't have built atomic bombs without using Nazi parts and

weapons
grade uranium. Apparently the Manhatten Project produced no workable

designs
and no weapons grade uranium. To prove Nazi parts were used he will

present you
with a photograph of Fat Man with German markings only he can see never

mind
the Nazis produced no plutonium.


I've been through all this with him in excruciating detail.
His usual response is that the proof is in documents
so sekrit nobody has ever actually seen them.

Then he retreats into his Hans Kammler did it in Joanastal
fantasy. This involves Nazi UFO's with antigravity engines
armed with nuclear weapons. They must have been real duffers
to let us mere mortals beat them with nothing more than P-51's, Spitfires,
B-17's and Lancasters

Keith


Keith



Ummm...the use of pretexts as justifications for war is hardly a
conspiracy theory - it is standard practice. The accidental sinking of
the USS Maine, the sinking of the Lusitania, the provocation of the
Mexicans by Taylor...all of these are well documented historical
facts.

WHy, the National Security Archives just last week released recently
declassifed documents which prove (again) that the Gulf of Tonkin
incident (attack on the Maddox) was a manufactured pretext.

This sort of thing is standard practice the world over.








----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---