"Lee" wrote in message
6.92...

"Ron" rudely blurted out news:48fe3534$0$9253$ba620dc5
@nova.planet.nl:

snip

Your loss, my oversight

I don't know what I was thinking... must have had
a brain fart. I completely forgot what group I was
dealing with...

The biggest group of scary old women to occupy a
sewing circle.

I bet it makes the average member fill their Depends
when they see that exe file. It is scary enough just
to see posted those mysterious RAR files, the evil-wicked
PAR files, and those damnable Y-encodings.

Funny how you always switch to being seriously offensive when people don't
do things your way.

Interesting how I use a real email address in my posts
and you don't. Although I have spam-bot defenses in the
address, you can still email me by pulling YOUR HEAD out.
Why would I want to post **** that could easily be traced
back to me by way of email or TRUE news-header information,
and thereby be dropped from accounts and possibly put in
jail?

Hold on a second... Are you accusing me of forging my headers? You're not
are you? You wouldn't make the mistakes you're accusing other people of.
Right? Or are you? Cause if you intend to keep that up as the truth, I'd
sure like to see some proof.

**** it, don't open the gawd-damn thing. It isn't worth the
inestimably valuable time of this group.

Well, now that you mention it: it sure isn't mine.

Ow, by the way: signatures should be at most 4 lines. And a signature should
be set apart by a separator containing two times - and a space. In case
you don't understand: have a look at mine. :-)
No offense, just pointing out what you already know, as you've told us again
and again you know how to use Usenet.


---------------------
Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
Alan Erskine says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
"I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
(nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
Lee discussing newsserver retention:
"...I can go back about 6 months..."
Alan Erskine interrupts with:
"Why should we wait for six months to download an image
that was posted yesterday?"


Kind regards,
Ron
--
Non urinat in ventum