View Single Post
  #55  
Old June 9th 04, 05:18 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denyav" wrote in message
...
1) They didnt


This is the whole point .according to the Government they did

not,according to
the Intelligence officers they did and they did it repeately.
On eve of Pearl Harbor attact,even during a secret White House meeting

they
discussed their Pearl Harbor specific information.
But of course White House denies even this meeting!.


A sekrit meeting with no evidence of course

LOL

Thats why Kimmel and Short were fired.
Halsey on the other hand had a full CAP up,
all his scouts out and had told Kimmel that
if he saw as much as a Sampan he'd sink it.


This message instructed the commanders at Pearl
to prepare for war, they failed to do so and were
fired.

They needed scapegoats to cover their acts otherwise you might be forced

to
think the unthinkable,namely the bringing FDR and Marshall to the Justice

for
treason.
As far as I know even US Congress found Kimmel at no fault and accepted
revisionistic version of events,but its ,like saying now "Spain had

nothing to
with Maine",namely too late .


Incorrect, the findings of the 3 congressional investigations
are a matter of record.


The luring Japanase to attack Pearl Harbor,in other words "Pearl Harbor

trap"
worked well.
I couple of Military intelligence officers could have ruined eveything but

they
were not allowed to do so.

No he didnt, he went to the White House with the 14th
part of the Japanese message which contained no
atatck plans at all, not even a declaration of war in fact.


Yeah right!.

No just liars.


Iraqi WMDs for example?



Nice attempt to change the subject but you've
just proved how difficult cover up's really are.

Keith




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---