"Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote in message
...

McNicoll is known for picking or inventing the most immaterial nits
with of the most unreasonable interpretations of ordinary discussion.
His dedication to the task is kind of sad for onlookers and
aggravating to participants -- kind of like a three-year old asking
"why?" ad infinitum. Offer him a lollipop, not more argument.


He has yet to offer any argument.