View Single Post
  #33  
Old May 16th 05, 11:39 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote in message
...
Many people see using fake names as a worse breach of netiquette than
x-no- archive (which most see as none).


So? If you're going to breach etiquette, who cares how you do it?

I don't agree with those people,


So anonymous posting is fine with you. Okay.

I think either should be allowed and is no business of others.


So why would someone use x-no-archive? It's entirely unreliable, while
posting anonymously is entirely reliable (assuming you don't do something
that will invoke a right to a subpoena, of course).

If you are concerned about profiling, anonymous posting is the only way to
go.

Abuse is never acceptable of course.


Of course. Don't see what that has to do with the question of x-no-archive
though.

Pete