Thread: aerobatic C172?
View Single Post
  #12  
Old May 2nd 07, 05:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 84
Default aerobatic C172?


Rolling Airplanes

You too could make the hit parade.

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20070221X00205&key=1''

Probably had enough energy. No Tex Johnson.

Bill Hale


On May 2, 8:58 am, john smith wrote:
In article .com,

gt wrote:
I own a 1960 Cessna 172 with 2500 hours on the airframe. It is not
rated for aerobatic flight, but the positive and negative G loads that
it is approved for far exceed the normal G forces associated with a
well-executed barrel roll.
Has anyone heard of this maneuver being performed in a 1960 172?


Not enough "energy" to be performed in level flight.
It can be done in a dive by a competent aerobatic pilot, maintaining
airspeed and 1-G loading throughout the maneuver.