On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:04:08 -0600, Newps wrote
in :

John Gaquin wrote:

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message

Changing the terms of a contract without the agreement of all parties
constitutes a breach of contract, doesn't it?


The first thing to determine is whether or not unrestricted freedom of dress
is a matter of contract under the present agreement.

It was under the old agreement, which expired. We were not under any
contract after that.

Why not? Surely NATCA members are working under an agreement between
the union and the FAA.