View Single Post
  #12  
Old December 10th 17, 07:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Don Johnstone[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 398
Default Slingsby T.61 MotorFalke

At 03:28 09 December 2017, Ryan Wubben wrote:
At 01:35 09 December 2017, Don Johnstone wrote:
At 23:53 08 December 2017, Matti T. Koskinen wrote:
lauantai 4. joulukuuta 2004 5.51.36 UTC+2 R. Wubben kirjoitti:
Is this an exact copy of the Scheibe SF-25?
How hard is it to get Stamo engine parts in the US?
What would one go for in the US if it has been well taken

care of
and
recently recovered and repainted?
Could one register it in the new sport pilot, or Light Sport

Aircraft
rules?
How are they to fly?
Any big AD's on them?

Thanks for any collective wisdom out there!
Ryan in Madison, WI





Hi all Falke peoples,

We have here in Finland one Sligsby Falke T61C mod. It is

modified
little
bit...engine is now Limbach SL1700 and wings are shorted 1m

from both side.
Register no. is OH-415 and photo can see on next list.
http://www.rcawsey.co.uk/t61.htm

Matti T. Koskinen


Before investing in one you might want to read this:

http://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/UKPAD1976.pdf

Basically the Slingsby Venture is an endangered species


Interesting. What is the basis for this?
Would the same apply to the Scheibe versions?

Ryan

You would have to assume that it might. Both aircraft share the
same metal tube fuselage, the main difference is the carbon fibre
spar which as far as I know, does not have a fatigue life, neither
does wood.
The mention of fatigue would tend to suggest a problem with a
metal part or parts. The way the AD is worded would mean that the
aircraft is scrap when it reaches the limit