View Single Post
  #51  
Old August 5th 05, 04:38 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 03:37:45 -0400, "Happy Dog"
wrote in : :

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:48:10 -0400, "Happy Dog"
wrote in ::

Do you really believe that this is being considered to reduce
clutter?


I'm talking about radar screen clutter. Yes. I see no other rational
reason for the DC ADIZ.

Why do you think it was implemented?


Political pressure. Absolute irrelevant bull****.


Are you able to provide any supporting evidence for that assumption?

As for clutter, have you visited a radar facility?


Does the SoCal TRACON count?

It's a computer game.


No. It's real time tracking of aircraft in the NAS.

There is a huge amount of filtering that goes on specifically
to reduce clutter.


Are you referring to the clutter caused by ground based targets? I'm
referring to making it easier to spot primary targets in congested
airspace.