View Single Post
  #38  
Old July 15th 10, 01:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default L13 Blanik Mandatory Bulletin


Aluminum, however, does not have the "knee" in the stress/cycle graph
that takes it effectively parallel with the X axis. With aluminum, the
curve heads inexorably towards the X axis.


I see that for some Al alloys and with unnotched coupons, but most all
aircraft metallic structure are notched because of fastener holes. I
am looking at one notched curve now that goes parallel at 10^7
cycles. No glider is going to see the 60-80000 hr life that large
aircraft have proven by service and test. For example, the rewinged
C-5b has an expected service life of 100,000 hrs, validated by fatigue
test. After the test they cut one panel, notched another, and were
unable to get a failure.

Metal structures have been certified with an infinite
fatigue life.


That is almost always true for aircraft certified under the old CAR 3
regulations which did not address fatigue. It is even true for some
aircraft certified under the more modern Part 23 and JAR22
regulations. Unfortunately, the map is not the territory: Just because
the CAA or whoever certified that it is so doesn't mean it is actually
so.


I was referring to among other things, rotor blades cetified in the
70's, that had fatigue, DADT anaylysis and full scale test tests done
with simulated damage.



There is an EXCELLENT, plain language discussion of the design
considerations and fatigue calculations in the Blanik repair and
overhaul manuals published in the mid 70's.


That sounds like valuable material, I would definitely like to read
it. How can I get a copy of that documentation?


I believe the manuals that came with our blanik are available on the
Blanik America site. I think you will find them of great interest,
esp since the EASA AD now is also a US AD as of this Friday.

aerodyne