View Single Post
  #41  
Old May 11th 05, 10:18 PM
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Christopher Campbell wrote:
On 5/11/05 9:40 AM, in article
, "Paul kgyy"
wrote:

True to the rugged pioneer spirit of our great country, DC cowered

for
cover again as a Cessna violated the no-fly zone. Fighter jets

were
scrambled to deal with this imminent threat to the security of our
nation.


The pilots of those fighter jets, armed to the teeth, would be

arrested the
moment they flew a Cessna 150 into the same area. Apparently the

latest
technology in military armament is less dangerous than a Cessna 150.

What
does the government know about our little airplanes that we don't? We

should
form a committee to study the secret powers we are wielding!


You're not supposed to point out facts like that.
According to their logic
A fully armed supersonic fighter crashing into a building won't have
half the effect that a C152 will have..
Who's running the asylum ?