Thread
:
Cessna Cardinal 177 RG II v. Piper Arrow III (70s) v. Piper Arrow III (brand new)
View Single Post
#
22
September 15th 06, 10:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
Posts: 101
Cessna Cardinal 177 RG II v. Piper Arrow III (70s) v. Piper Arrow III (brand new)
Newps wrote:
wrote:
Also the Arrow is, in my experience, friendlier in turbulence, don't
get me wrong, the Cardinal is a great plane but I would "prefer" an
Arrow after looking at all the details right now.
I wouldn't touch a Cessna RG with a 10 foot pole. For that reason alone
go with the Arrow. The Cessna retractable gear is poorly designed and
will cause you problems.
But if I do touch an C177RG with a ten foot pole... doesn't that put me
right under the wing?
On a serious note... why is it a poor system, the RG II I've been
flying has never given the hint of a bad system, no leaks, no
hesitation no nothing, and a engenious emergency extention system to
boot.
[email protected]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by
[email protected]
Find all threads started by
[email protected]