View Single Post
  #78  
Old December 10th 03, 07:41 AM
John Keeney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul J. Adam" wrote in message
...
In message , Kevin Brooks
writes
As to air-to-ground use, I believe
the resident Strike Eagle driver has already provided a reason for

retaining
a strafe capability, i.e., recent operations in Afghanistan. During

Anaconda
the need for up-close-and-personal support (read that as well within the
danger-close margin) was reported. You can't *always* use your LGB's or
JDAM's, which is why the grunts liked the cannon armed aircraft during

that
fight.


Are there no gun pods? This has always been a capability that can be
bolted onto aircraft as necessary.


Gun pods are great draggy things that really cut in to performance.

If you were designing the capability from scratch, would you insist on
the M61? Consider a larger-calibre weapon with more A/G punch like a
KCA? Or go for fuel and/or lightness, and hang a podded gun for 'danger
close' missions?


The problem is that those danger close missions tend to be unpredicted
by their nature otherwise we would simply avoid the great majority all
together. And in many cases arming up a plane specifically to fly one
-say in Qatar- and getting it on station -oh, over Afghanistan- is going to
take too long.