"Yeff" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:21:07 -0700, Daryl Hunt wrote:

Besides, I guess the Fighter/Bomber designation from MD says they
haven't a
clue to the own AC usage is supposed to be.

So MD/Boeing would know all about the FB-4 Phantom, right? From a search
using Boeing's own search engine at http://search-www2.boeing.com/:

The search results are he http://preview.tinyurl.com/2hpnpg

Your search - FB-4 - did not match any documents.
No pages were found containing "FB-4".

Nope, but if you dig a bit deeper, you will find the old MD pages that
clearly calls it a Fighter/Bomber.

Now, remember, you are now fair game so you might wish to be a bit more
careful.