View Single Post
  #12  
Old July 18th 04, 05:17 AM
Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So what interests you?

The SR20 is interesting, but I am still thinking the wingload is too high
for a new pilot (less than 300 hours). Also, the cost to own the SR is much
higher than the DA40 due to insurance costs, and other issues. Sure, 100
pounds would be more interesting, and I bet they could go to 200 hp and get
it, but would that really make it more marketable?

You have to remember that these planes now come with a lot more weight
requirements due to the new FARS. Also, the DA40 is a pussycat in pitch.
The only thing better in my book is the Lancair, and it's a lot more money.



"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Dude" wrote:
Poor?


For a new, 4-place design, yes. Another 100# of useful load plus the
53-gal. tanks would make it a more interesting airplane.

It has the same engine as a 172 SP or an Archer, but it gets an extra

20
knots.


Those are some ancient designs; I certainly wouldn't be interested in
buying a new model of either one as a cross country cruiser. The D-40
has some nice features, but it falls short in the range/payload
department. If all Diamond was trying to do was make a better Archer,
well, I guess maybe they succeeded -- but so what?

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM