Thread: MMA or P-3C
View Single Post
  #4  
Old March 12th 05, 04:45 PM
Jeroen Wenting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Marco P.J. Borst" wrote in message
...
What do you think of Boeing MMA? Does it really have a future? Or is it
likely that the whole project will be cancelled in the near future in

favour
of a P-3C refurbishment program (re-winging, engine overhauls and

structure
program)?

That will only extend the life of the fleet a few more years... The Orion
fleet is fast approaching its structure life at which point they need
replacement with something.
While I agree the MMA might not be the best aircraft the navy could have
ordered it's the best currently on the market.
The P-7 program revived would be more suitable but likely just as expensive.

Be glad they don't go the way of the Dutch navy and scrap the entire MPA
capability...

A lot of rumours are currently going around on this subject and from a
"money saving" point of view I guess it wouldn't be very surprising if
operational life time will be added to the current P-3C fleet... the costs
(USD 15 million per aircraft) are peanuts when compared to the Boeing

MMA...

That won't save a cent. The 15 million per aircraft will extend the life by
a few years only and not reduce the skyhigh maintenance cost of the fleet.
The MMA will cost more initially but can keep flying for 40 years or so at
lower maintenance cost.
And of course the MMA has parts commonality as well as a common typerating
to the BBJs the Navy already has in their fleet, and with the thousands of
737 in service with airlines, reducing the procurement cost of parts and the
training cost of pilots considerably.