View Single Post
  #54  
Old September 30th 05, 06:15 AM
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Peter Duniho wrote:
"george" wrote in message
ups.com...
No. Pilot experience good 1.5 million lines of code bad..

Based on what? You have an opinion, not proof.


Based on over 20 years experience with computors and computorised
systems


Like I said, opinion. You're welcome to it, but don't go thinking it proves
anything.


I have only ridden on one computorised rail system the Docks Light Rail
in London.
And they had so many problems they put staff back on....

I do not know why you have this bias against pilots.
Are you envious?


Ahh, yes...the old "I'm losing ground, so insult my foe" tactic. How's that
working for you?


You have spent time insulting pilots with the old 'blame the dead guy'
as the explanation for accidents..
It just isn't that simple.
Again , are you envious of pilots?


[...]
I have one incident that the Accident Report claimed pilot error.
The second enquiry negated the first on -new- engineering evidence


So what? That doesn't show a general problem.


How many errors does it take before you'd say "Hey, there's something
not right" ?