A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Jim Logajan wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Nobody said the FAA was going to properly correct the problem but
that is what the aim of the action is. The better way to correct the
problem would be to just have someone in OKC look through the
magazines and search the internet, find those operations that are in
violation, refuse the AW certificates of the next 3 aircraft that
roll out of their hanger and very publicly announce the action.
Ouch. Unless I'm missing something, that appears to advocate
arbitrary and capricious use of authority.
If all these alleged rich scoundrels are already skirting the law,
there is no need to change them, right? Do you really think it is
wise to promote and encourage changes to the laws that suddenly makes
a victimless activity a criminal activity? What if it were an
activity you engaged in and someone else was trying to make it
illegal?
Excuse me? I specifically wrote that the better way was to enforce the
law as it is already written. And to pick out companies or individuals
for enforcement action who are advertising a violation of the law is
hardly arbitrary or capricious.
Okay - my misread. Sorry.
|