wmbjk wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:35:16 +1100, George Ghio
wrote:


wmbjk wrote:

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:05:32 +1100, George Ghio
wrote:


When a lie becomes industry-accepted terminology then the industry is in
deep ****.


It was never a "lie" except in your ignorant vernacular. And for an
industry in "deep ****" it seems to be doing rather well overall.


"Modified Sq. Wave" is just that. Sine Wave is not stepped.


sigh You might correct your error by listing some popular "sine"
wave inverters, and the number of steps in their "not stepped"
waveforms.

Yes Mildred there really are true sine wave inverters that are not just
a sq. wave with many, many steps.


Another unsupported claim by Mr. Hole Digger. But at least you've
admitted in weasel-speak that some snorf "sine" wave inverters *do*
have stepped waveforms. Would you say that they're manufactured and
sold by liars?


Do your own ****ing search.


I take that to mean that you won't be providing any examples of sine
wave inverters with stepless waveforms. What a shocker.

Wayne

although I find myself in agreement with george (very scary, especially
after his recent voltage driven LED faux pas) that the moniker "Modified
Sine Wave" is a misleading term, and should be changed to "Modified
Square Wave" in order to more accurately reflect the technology, you
seemed to have gotten under his skin a bit. Congrats.


--
Steve Spence
Dir., Green Trust, http://www.green-trust.org
Contributing Editor, http://www.off-grid.net
http://www.rebelwolf.com/essn.html