On Saturday, 27 February 2021 at 21:40:08 UTC, Gregg Ballou wrote:
On Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 4:26:37 PM UTC-5, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:19:35 -0800, Gregg Ballou wrote:

Blindness being reported as a vaccine side effect
https://principia-scientific.com/uk-...ocking-report-
on-covid-vaccine-side-effects/
If you believe anything that bunch of climate sceptics have to say about
COVID vaccines, I have this really nice bridge over the East River going
cheap....
--
Martin | martin at
Gregorie | gregorie dot org
Article links to the gov't source for their claims. Is the gov't wrong? Some truth hungry provaxxer needs to go check that the article didn't misreport the gov't's reports while they can still see. Funny how people attack the messenger for passing on government vaccine data.

Something on the website of the Royal National Institute for the Blind says that over 24,000 new people in the UK are given a certificate of visual impairment each year

That averages about 65 a day

So, using a mixture of statistics and pure chance, how many would you expect to see in a randomly chosen sample group that increases in size from zero to 20 million in about 60 days? Maybe 500-600?

Even if the numbers reported in the documents you are referring to come out smaller than that, it doesn't mean the vaccines reduce the natural odds. Note the qualifying comment that these are only reports that people sent in, they wondered if they were affected, it doesn't actually prove a connection.