View Single Post
  #5  
Old January 17th 09, 06:52 PM posted to alt.activism.noise.pollution,alt.conspiracy,rec.aviation.misc,alt.disasters.aviation,talk.environment
Bill Mulcahy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default JFK Airport Birdstirke Dangers Being Ignored?

I see posting on the rec.aviation.misc newsgroup has brought out the
pro-noise
and air pollution yahoos.

I live far away from the JFK Runway flightpath now but I still think it is
highly dangerous
for planes to take off from. JFK Airport should be closed and the land
returned to the
magnificent wetlands filled with wildlife it once was. Moving
health-damaging airports
away from densely populated areas is what many civilized countries are
doing.

You all may love the sound and smell of jet engines in the morning; I like
the
sound of nature... birds and the honking of geese.

Bill Mulcahy

"Government Shill #2" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:42:27 -0500, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:

In article ,
Government Shill #2 wrote:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:56:39 -0500, "Bill Mulcahy"

wrote:

For years I have been talking about the danger of using a JFK runway
(22
right) that
has a bird nesting area (Joco Marsh) at it's end.

Birdstrike Bill!

Welcome back Dud. Good to see you're still in the land of the living.
Talking about living are you still living under the flightpath in
Rockaway?


Bill may be technically "living," but he certainly is brain-dead!


You have to give him credit for sticking with his delusions. Not many
kOOks
have been posting since the mid 90s and are still willing to be laughed
at.
He doesn't post nearly enough these days, though. He is, without doubt,
one
of the more amusing TWA800 Loons.

--
Shill #2

Great Tarverisms #4

The clerk boy is practicly illiterate.

John

alt.disasters.aviation
10 November 2002