"Richard Riley" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 13:27:25 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:

:
:"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
:
: Yes, I do. Prior to this they had an unknown liability if they did
what
: Daley did. Now they have a known, and very small, liability. Most
people
: will take a known vs. an unknown any day. Before they were still
: wondering what might happen. Now they know, and they know it is a
trivial
: fine.
:
:
:Chicago was hit with the maximum fine. Because of Meigs the fine has
been
:increased.

If they're serious about dealing with Chicago, they need to prevent
any expansion at O'Hare and stop construction of a third airport.


No, they don't need to prevent it, they just should not fund it.



After all, Chicago has clearly demonstrated that they don't think they
need more airport capacity.


Zackly.