Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

And you know the software is "poorly-tested" how?

Decades of software engineering. Thorough testing is a mathematical
impossibility (or, more specifically, it is "computationally infeasible").

Bull****.

You haven't a clue what goes on inside any particular company.

The system does not fly the airplane and is not an autopilot.

It "senses that the pilot has lost control" and recovers.

Do you want an airplane that "senses" that you've "lost control" and
"recovers"?

It could be handy under certain circumstances.

You might want a bus with an automatic system to keep it from drifting into
opposing traffic, but would you want a sports car that tries to keep you in
your lane whenever it "senses" that you might be moving out of it? What's the
point of operating a vehicle for fun if it's going to watch over your shoulder
and try to take over every time you exercise your freedom to drive as you see
fit?

And yet once again the point sails right over the top of your clueless head.



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.