On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:08:12 GMT, "John E. Carty"
wrote:

They had to include the chute to get this aircraft certified because of its
lack of spin recovery :-)

Wow! That's **** poor, isn't it? Kinda makes the subject a bit moot
(or mute for Ron)!

"Michael 182" wrote in message
news:5mRsb.193024$Tr4.545029@attbi_s03...
This bothered me as well. While I think the chute is a great idea, and
will
probably save a number of lives before all is said and done, doesn't it
strike you as strange that the POH (at least accourding to the NTSB report
I
read) says that the only method of spin recovery is to deploy the chute.
Why
doesn't opposite rudder work?

Michael

"Tom S." wrote in message
...
Nice to know that the only spin recovery is to deploy (maybe) a
'chute.