"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article C9%rk.603$UX.108@trnddc03, "Mike"
wrote:

In fact, the official described what happened and admitted the
inspector's
actions damaged the aircraft. Two days later the airline and TSA issued
a
joint statement saying they share the same goals which seems to indicate
the
airline was satisfied with the response from TSA which probably means TSA
is
in the process of taking actions to prevent a future occurrence and they
are
communicating that response to the airline.

The cynic in me suspects that one reasonable explanation for the airline
being "satisfied" is that you don't **** off the people who can make your
life miserable.

I would suspect the reverse. If you don't think a large corporation like
AMR can make the life of the TSA administrator miserable, you have a lot to
learn about being a cynic.