On Sunday, 15 October 2017 20:19:57 UTC+3, Jonathan St. Cloud wrote:
On Sunday, October 15, 2017 at 5:49:48 AM UTC-7, krasw wrote:
All this anecdotal evidence is pretty useless. We might guess that something might or might not happened if there is nose hook but in the end it is just that. A guess.

I wonder if you caught the irony in your declaration. I would offer that multiple parties with similar experiences is a statiscally valid trend.

Statistical data would be like "we have a group of Std.Cirrus gliders with nosehook and similar group with C/G hook, and we can say that this group exhibits XX accidents during tow per 100000 hrs, and other group YY accidents per 100000 hrs". Or something to that effect.