On Jul 21, 6:50*pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 7/21/2010 6:44 PM, brian whatcott wrote:





On 7/21/2010 1:49 PM, Tony wrote:
On Jul 21, 1:00 pm, jim wrote:
A year or two ago, there was a Phoebus that sold for under $7k on
Wings and Wheels. Now there's another (without a trailer) for $7k.
How does the value of a 17 meter, 42:1 glider NOT exceed that of a
1-26? I already have a glider I love, but I still like to look at
OTHER gliders (don't tell UF).

Jim

i've heard there can be issues with the balsa core that may be
difficult or impossible to inspect. they're basically first
generation glass. don't forget that there were 700 1-26's built,
there is tons of expertise, spare parts, a strong type organization,
and they are robust as hell. I do find a nice webpage from Bruno
Vassel that he had about his Phoebus and also a Yahoo Group, but have
a feeling that doesn't really compare with the 1-26 association.
Resale value involves a lot more than performance.

In case there may be some slight relevance, it's observed that the
first generation of glass sailboats were helluva stout - but where wood
was imbedded as stringers etc., they can be expected to have rotted out....

Brian W

Another data point -- some incredibly expensive boats are built with
balsa coring below the waterline. *See, for example, Baltic Yachts,
which has an excellent reputation for high quality.http://www.balticyachts.fi/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Also insulation/flotation in LPG tankers, floors in airliners (alum/
balsa sandwich).
After the Logan contest is over I'm going to ping Bruno about his
experience with the Phoebus.