No way. Everything I have read, including anti-privatization pieces from
AOPA, says fuel taxes and airlilne ticket taxes do not come close to funding
ATC and airport improvements. If it was already self funding, there would
be no incentive to privatize it and the controllers union wouldn't be afraid
of privatization.

Mike
MU-2


"Roger Halstead" wrote in message
...
On 04 Sep 2003 04:27:03 GMT, Stan Gosnell
wrote:

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in
link.net:

The pilots don't like it because they are forced to pay for the
services that they recieve. Everybody else likes it.

"the people who have personally benefitted financially" are the
pilots and controllers.

And those few citizens who buy airline tickets. If the airlines had to
pay
for ATC services, do you really think they wouldn't pass those charges on
to the passengers? As it is, the cost is spread out among everyone who
pays taxes,

My understanding:
The system as it is currently financed is from fuel and gate (ticket)
taxes. The system is not only self supporting, but actually
accumulates money. Unfortunately the way the system is set up the FAA
has to justify the money they spend as if it comes from the general
fund. Only those who fly and use aviation fuel are paying in to the
system, not he general taxpayer.

It is one of the few government agencies that has been self
supporting, even if it does have some problems. Many of which are due
to the way congress lets them have their own money.

Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member)
www.rogerhalstead.com
N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2)

and the burden to any one individual is negligible.