Dave Doe wrote:
In article ,
, crashdummy says...
just a curiosity question: is anything wrong, illegal, or dangerous in
entering a c150 into a spin at 9,000' and holding full elevator to
maintain it down to 2000 before recovering since spins are often
prohibited at lower altitudes?

Gee that sounds like fun! My spin instructors never liked spinning
*that* much. That said, only had two instructors that were into
teachign me spin recovery. It was not *manditory* when I did my PPL in
NZ - and don't believe it is still. However I think it's near essential
to learn - as well as a chitload of fun. I asked to do spin recovery
under the hood - which was a heap of fun too. And it was great to be
able to suceed in doing it.

Others have answered your questions about the plane - is it approved for
spinning etc. Only other comment is that it may not be that wise to
recover by 2,000'??? - I was always taught to recover by 3,000' AGL. I
guess that's really an instructor/club thing - and therefore where you
should direct your question.

You'll be spining with an instructor anyway right? (dual?). In NZ you'd
need to be approved for aerobatics (and that particular manoeuvre) to
spin solo.


That's pretty much how I learnt to recover from spins - by doing them.
Look up ZK-BCZ
And we also had recovery altitude at 3000...
Nowadays fully developed stalls recovery with minimum height loss appear
to be the norm