Gotta watch the temperatures around those sensors...

Up down left right is what you want to 'see'.

http://zone.ni.com/devzone/devzone.n...25684A004EB0F4


"Jim Weir" wrote in message ...
I've come across a marvelously cheap vibration sensor that I want to convert
into an engine vibration instrument for a Kitplanes article. The electronics
for me is relatively trivial...the mechanics of vibration are a little harder to
fathom.

From a mechanical engineering point of view on a horizontally opposed engine,
there are (as with most things) three axes of freedom -- fore and aft, side to
side, and up and down (longitudinal, lateral, vertical).

The sensor I have reads two axes, and my hit is that fore-aft is the least
interesting vibration mode of the engine. The question is whether to have a
two-channel meter (which complexes up both the design AND the panel space), a
single meter switchable between lateral and vertical) or a single meter with the
two axes summed together.

Comments and thoughts from the technonerds amongst us appreciated.

(It has nothing, repeat NOTHING to do with the fact that such a meter might have
detected a crack in that cylinder WAY BEFORE it departed the engine on the way
home from Oshkosh {;-) )


Jim


Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com