View Single Post
  #208  
Old October 15th 05, 08:16 AM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:39:39 GMT, "Frankie"
wrote:

The Cirrus is a great plane, but its not a really pretty one. I
parked next to a new Columbia the other day, and that airplane is
really pretty....


Straying off topic......I think the Cirrus looks better than the Columbia.
The only problem with the Cirrus is its landing gear: the main wheels are
too far apart and the nose strut looks chunky since it's straight. Install a


Wide gear is good. Narrow is bad.
Just think in those terms.
Wide means stability on the ground.

nice arched nose wheel strut - like on the Grumman Tiger - and move the main
gear together and the problem would be corrected.

The proportions of a Columbia just don't look right to me, especially the
window lines. It looks too much like an experimental (still) - kinda goofy.

You're right about Cardinals: they look great and have much airspeed
potential if cleaned up.


To me the Cardinal is the niced plane Cessna built, right after the
310.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com


Frankie