On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:27:40 -0500, Kurt Weber wrote:
LOL. Yes, I did.

I'm really not too sure about that.

I'm really not sure why you're asking.

Because you appear to not have.

I'm fairly
surprised to see you commenting in what appears to be a hostile manner.

If it came off as such to you, too bad. It wasn't.

LOL. What an idiot you. You're rude and attacked. Then lie about
it. What a dolt.


Should I have given you a link to address your browser crashing as well?

No. I wasn't asking for help. I was just asking why you posted a reply to
my original comment that had absolutely nothing to do with what I stated in
that comment.


This is unreal. I'm amazed. You need to go back and read. What an idiot
you are. You're attacking me for being helping AND offering information
which may be of value to you and the site that you're complaining about.
If you still think I did not respond to you, on topic, then you seriously
need to learn about something called reading comprehension. After it's
all said and done, perhaps you are confusing this with a moderated group?
Clearly it's not. So, even if I was off topic, which I was not, tough!
Get a life and then get over it.

If, on the other hand, you wish to offer something of substance to support
how or why I did not respond, on topic, do so. If you wish to offer proof
that you did not passively attack, twice, then do. But frankly, at this,
it's only going to make you look like a bigger moron.

Shesh. Help some people and they pee their pants. Go figure.