View Single Post
  #10  
Old September 3rd 05, 01:39 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 00:16:30 GMT, "Dudley Henriques"
dhenriques@noware .net wrote in
et::


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:57:52 GMT, "Dudley Henriques"
dhenriques@noware .net wrote in
. net::

Although some mid airs are survivable, and incidents can be easily found
and
quoted, ...


Yep. Here are a couple of mo
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...13X33340&key=1
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...26X00109&key=2

Did you notice that all three I cited are civil/military? In each
case the military pilot survived, and in one case the civil pilot did
too.


I've been reading these reports for years. There's nothing new in them.


That sort of depends on how many years you've been reading them. If
one looks at military/civil MACs that occurred in the CONUS, one finds
that in each case the (5) military pilots walked away subsequent to
surviving the initial impact. In only one case the civil pilot landed
safely. In that case a military fighter collided with a glider, and
the NTSB found the glider pilot to be at fault despite his having the
right of way.