View Single Post
  #5  
Old February 19th 09, 09:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ramy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default stall recognition and recovery

I wish so too, but the reality is different. The last 2 commercial
aviation accidents proves it - birds and ice (probably). Luckily in
the first case there was a big river to land in.
The only thing we can really depend on is statistics...

Ramy

On Feb 19, 12:30*pm, Nyal Williams wrote:
I, for one, hope that all accidents are pilot error; we must be able to
depend on our equipment all the time. *Otherwise, there is no hope.

At 20:02 19 February 2009, Ramy wrote:



On Feb 19, 7:44=A0am, Andy *wrote:
The following references are provided, without my comment, for those
interested in the subject of stall recognition and recovery.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1234...?mod=3Ddjemale....
..


reports on the referenced fatal accident:


http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?...MA003&rpt=3Dfa


http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2007/AAR0701.pdf


Andy


I simply don't buy it. How any pilot with even basic experience, not
to mention thousands of hours, will react to a stall warning by
pulling on the stick/yoke?? and "pitched up to a 31-degree angle" ??
It's not like they were so close to the ground that they had to pullup
to clear it. As usual, the NTSB rather put the blame on the pilots...


Ramy- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -