View Single Post
  #30  
Old May 11th 05, 04:11 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
ups.com...

Matt Barrow wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

In the instant
case, it is not feasible for private concerns to operate the

weather
bureau infrastructure, inclusing constellations of weather

satellites
and so on.


Oh, like the constellation of communications satellites?
And the broadcast groups?


How many of those were put into orbit by privately developed and
operated launch vehicles?


Every one of them.

NASA has no manufacturing capacity of it own.



There is also a need for consistant (preferably high)
quality and availabllity from the standpoint of public saftey.


So you rely on government bureaucrats to provide that?


Yes and they do.


LOL!! Boy are you easily satisfied. Good little menchen, you!



These are much the same people as run the Postal Disservice and

Amtrak.

Unhappy with the USPS are you? It has already been privatized.


Man, you're nievity is incredible.

Here the story a while back about the USPS fining people for carrying first
class mail?

How much do UPS and FedEx pay in income taxes? In property taxes?

Privitized? Like AMTRAK?

Like I said: get a clue!

IMHO, service was far more consistant and consistantly good
when there was a Postmaster General in the Cabinet.


Yup. They took decades to convert to faster means of transport that UPS and
FexEx had from day ONE.

In essence, the old Post Office didn't evolve during it's first 170 years of
existence.

The comparison is not the Post Office and the modern day USPS, it's FedEx,
UPS, and a slew of local delivery services/


Amtrak could not compete with the heavily subsidized airline
industry regardless of who managed it.


Want to compare subsidies for the airlines versus Amtrak?
The proposal would not significantly reduce the government's costs,
but would significantly reduce the public benefit. Not good.


Yeah..corporations give us all our comforts and prosperity, but they

could
do that.

Get a clue!!


I'm not able to parse that, But riddle me this, is the market
for weather reporting more lucrative in heavily populated areas
or in sparsley populated areas? Which of those two are the
preferred areas for GA?


Non-sequitur -- the market is nation wide.

Again, get a clue rather than the bilge the media and your handlers shoved
down your throat and which you uncritically swallowed.