View Single Post
  #17  
Old December 2nd 03, 03:07 AM
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 20:09:35 GMT, Kyler Laird
wrote:

Ron Wanttaja writes:


Well... as far as homebuilts are concerned, fuel exhaustion (defined as the
pilot running the airplane out of fuel) plays only a minor role in the
overall accident rate. During 1998-2000, only 4.5% of all homebuilt
accidents involved fuel exhaustion (including some accidents that occurred
during precautionary landings due to a low fuel state).


How many of "all homebuilt accidents" involved an "emergency landing"?
(I don't think we mean "landing" to include "falling to earth in pieces".)


About 20% of the homebuilt accidents in that period involved a loss of
power due to mechanical failure of the engine or fuel system (vs. pilot
mismanagement of fuel or power system). About 15% engine related, about 5%
fuel-system related.

BTW, do any homebuilts use easily-sheared tip-tanks (like some Cessnas and
Lears do)?


Closest thing I'm aware of is the droppable fuel tank used in the O'Neill
Magnum...

Ron Wanttaja