View Single Post
  #10  
Old September 9th 04, 09:44 PM
Eunometic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Mullen" wrote in message ...
"Denyav" wrote in message
...
seriously doubt that anyone in Russia proper wants Chechnyan rebels with
nukes,
do they?
Dave


Nuclear tipped ICBMs are not very suitable weapons aganist terrorists ,but
they
are excellent weapons to deter countries that use terrorists as proxies.
The recipients of Putins televised message is without any doubt are Anglos
who
use Al-Queda and other so called islamic terrorists as proxies to realize
their
domestic and foreign policy goals.

Putins message is only a lightly disguised way of saying to US "Stop
Al-Queda
terrorism inside Russia,or else".

If they are really serious,I am pretty sure that so called islamic
terrorism
will take a vacation in Russia.


What nonsense!

John


The US has a history of using islamic based insurgence as a wedge
against various European countries. The behaviour of the US during
the Yugoslave/Bosnian/Kosovo issues was highly pro-islamic, clearly
calculated to win favour in the middle east for the US oil interests
and zionist sympathies while snuffing out any possible rival post
eastern block alignments based on slavic ethniticities, orthodox
christianity. This was despite the fact that the former yugoslave
people were facing unprovoked terrorism, drug running, kidnapping and
murder in Kosovo. It was merely necessary to reframe sincere
anti-terrorism measures and the civil conflct as 'ethnic cleansing'
and 'genocide' (such crimes did occur but at a miniscule fraction of
the agit-prop propagandised rate and only AFTER NATO bombing reduced
the situation to disroder: the crimes also clearly weren't one sided)