On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:11:01 +0000, Keith Willshaw wrote:
"Oelewapper" wrote in message
...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...
A less than credible story I fear.
Well then, if they are guilty: why let the Guantanamo Britons go ???
Becasue there is insufficient evidence to prove before
a court that they are guilty.
What about most of the other ones? In most cases, the same should apply
too, shouldn't it?
Short answer: because they aren't Brits.
Not really human, or at least it seems they don't qualify for basic human
rights, or something like that. Good old US double standard, or what?
|