View Single Post
  #53  
Old November 17th 03, 04:07 PM
Bill Zaleski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim:

Tarver has no clue. You are correct. He just like to dance around
the obvious.

Bill A&P IA



On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:28:17 -0600, "James M. Knox"
wrote:

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in news:5YCdnQMkPtw0dyqiRVn-
:

But it can be flown by the renter, or his pilot (including a flight
instructor *the renter provides*, as long as it is in annual and
otherwise airworthy. No 100 hour inspection is required.


Nope, go read your own FAA opinion again.


Okay... been there, done that. Care to try to be more specific?

Note that I specifically referred to a flight instructor PROVIDED BY THE
RENTER. Be very careful when you simply see a sentence about use of the
aircraft "for hire or compenation, including flight instruction." If you
look more carefully you will see that they are talking about the FBO
providing both the plane and flight instructor. That indeed DOES require a
100 hour inspection.

-----------------------------------------------
James M. Knox
TriSoft ph 512-385-0316
1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331
Austin, Tx 78721
-----------------------------------------------