View Single Post
  #10  
Old September 2nd 08, 04:10 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
HEMI-Powered[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default Yenc decoder was "Ren Yenc" - 1 attachment

Lee added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

You miss the point entirely. Until the commercial news
services started making a bigger footprint, NOBODY made
money off of NNTP. Hence the cripple-ware status of MSOE
in relation to NNTP. Further proof is with the ISPs
dropping NGs like a warm turd, using the excuse of 0.08%
of the postings were "kiddie porn." There's tons more
porn of that type on the Web, but they don't address that,
do they? NO! because they make money off the web.
If MS or ATT or any other place could manipulate the prices
relating to NNTP, everyone would have easier access and
would be using MSOE.


The real problem with Microcrap is that they don't innovate now
and never have. They write very popular code for many purposes
and sell enough of it to monopolize the market but that hardly
makes them the best. Bill the Gates only innovates or adds
functionality long proven correct by independent developers when
he senses an economic advantage. So, in the case of OE, it not
only allows HTML which is very, very bad on Usenet but OE is a
very inefficient news reader and has difficulty downloading
multipart binaries. Of course, it cannot do yEnc at all without a
plug in. But, because the hundreds of millions of users all have
Microcrap software, they get OE for free and believe that it is
all they need.

I'm not necessarily in favor of people flooding this NG or others
I monitor with yEnc unless the collective group decides they want
to. My main autoposter is Rocketfuel which doesn't support yEnc
but I do have a version of PP2K that does. For the size pictures
posted here, the approx. 39% reduction in as-posted file size is
probably not that important, but for the people still stuck on
dial-up it is a God send.

I've seen flame wars break out in many NGs over the yEnc issue.
When you cut through all the crap and personal insults, what
sifts out is that the OE crowd simply won't change thus majority
rule disallows a more efficient encoding scheme. I guess that is
their right.

The software that most everyone in here refuses to try is
actually forestalling the death of NNTP. MS and many of
our dear providers have been trying for ten years to kill
off UseNet, cause they can't make a buck off it.


I don't know about that. But, I do thing that the major ISPs -
not NSPs - really don't understand Usenet at all and clearly
don't understand the difference between HTTP/SMTP and NNTP. But,
as I say above, the problem with OE, and thus the angst of its
users, is that Bill the Gates so far has refused to add a yEnc
decoder into the product. Then, too, Microcrap could have put the
major 3rd party utility developers out of business years ago if
they put in good technical functionality into the O/S and/or sold
it as a separate product. Until then, the yEnc wars will go on
and on and on.

We're talking about a newsreader functionality here, not some
rabid anti-Microsoft zealots conspiracy theory.


Odd, the non-functionality of MSOE is the root of every
argument in this swamp. The people who actually move to
a program that is capable and easy to use are the pariahs.
I don't even need to detail that nearly 98% of the viruses,
trojans, spyware etc. are written to specifically attack
MSWIN/MSOE/MS-anything.

I guess you could call it "odd". I think it is more an inertia
problem in that people simply don't like to change what they're
comfortable with even when it is obvious that the software
doesn't work.

Get past the anti-MS crap and you'll discover a product that
actually does what most people want.


Odd again. I'm using Vista as we speak, and I have copies
of every Windows version since Windows 2! I happen to
know quite well what does more than just what "most people
want." I want my computer to do what I want it to do.
MSOE doesn't handle newsgroups like I want... so I move
onward and upward.

Hands up all those who can remember the compression format
wars? ARC, ARJ, ZIP, LZH, ZOO etc etc.

Of all those competing formats, with their supposed
competition crushing benefits, how many are still used today?
Yenc is just repeating the same old format war, one which
it's highly unlikely to win.


The older compression schemes died out mainly because nobody
wrote a GUI app like WinZip for Windows and the vast majority of
users no longer wants to go to a DOS window and play around with
arcane command line switches and the like. As I recall, Arc and
Arj compressed less than Zip but Lzh was a little better. Yet,
Zip survived because WinZip is such a good utility. What is
especially interesting is why Microcrap never incorporated the
full functionality of the many utilities they've bought over the
years.

One of the main reasons for those wars was simply
entrepreneurs filling a giant hole that MS wasn't concerned
with addressing at the time. Y-encoding is a non-issue...
well, excepting those who still using MSOE cripple-ware.

In conclusion... I've built thousands of desk-top computers
since the 8088s. There are still scars on my hands from
pulling eproms. But I can't build a laptop like the majors
can. My point? I have to use laptops. Try to go into any
retailer and ask for a laptop with NOTHING on it. You can't.
If you could, it would easily be $300.00 cheaper. As I said,
there are no free lunches. The guys who use only the software
provided by the sharks will forever remain bait. For the
money they pay, they shouldn't have to bitch about not being
able to handle splits, RARs, PARs, and poor old much-maligned
Yenc.


--
HP, aka Jerry

Don't be a fop or a blooter, make only pithy comments on Usenet